|
|
Post by Lynx Shaman on Feb 11, 2006 18:59:39 GMT -5
What if there was also a policy setting for the most valuable item you have? As it stands, if you're trying to save up a less valuable item, you can only put one item of higher worth between it and being lost to overflow or combat. If you're trying to save Bauxite, for instance, the best you could hope for would be that it would be the third type of item lost. A most valuable resource policy could make it so that you could make a particular one that much less likely to be lost.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rycchus on Feb 12, 2006 12:19:44 GMT -5
That's a good idea!
|
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous on Feb 15, 2006 17:21:33 GMT -5
yeah it would be nice if you didn't have to worry about losing all the stuff you were trying to save without having to get rid of everything else you had.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rasteroid on Feb 15, 2006 19:36:00 GMT -5
This could be good. I'll think about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lynx Shaman on Feb 16, 2006 17:51:20 GMT -5
Yay! Consideration is good!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rasteroid on Feb 20, 2006 17:27:45 GMT -5
This idea has been implemented.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lynx Shaman on Feb 22, 2006 15:08:49 GMT -5
Thank you. We appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
Post by spamwise on Feb 22, 2006 15:16:55 GMT -5
Well, most of us do...  |
|
